<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>periscopeUP &#187; Paid Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.periscopeup.com/BaltimoreSEO/paid-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.periscopeup.com</link>
	<description>SEO Baltimore, SEO DC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google polices paid links by bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.periscopeup.com/blog/google-polices-paid-links-by-bloggers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.periscopeup.com/blog/google-polices-paid-links-by-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kaplan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.periscopeup.com/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Search Engine Watch, Google&#8217;s Spam Czar Matt Cutts says Google will punish bloggers who don&#8217;t use the no follow tag on the links included in paid posts. I interpret this move as Google&#8217;s way of making sure bloggers are open about what links and content (for things like product reviews) they were paid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/090303-120331" target="_blank">Search Engine Watch</a>, Google&#8217;s Spam Czar Matt Cutts says Google will punish bloggers who don&#8217;t use the no follow tag on the links included in paid posts.</p>
<p>I interpret this move as Google&#8217;s way of making sure bloggers are <span id="more-199"></span>open about what links and content (for things like product reviews) they were paid to include.</p>
<p>This will surely have wide ranging implications on the SEO of blogs and how marketing agencies will use bloggers to promote their clients&#8217; products and services.</p>
<p>My only hope is that Google will clearly clarify what they define as a paid link. For example, if a blogger recieves a tee-shirt for blogging about a product, are links they include considered &#8220;paid&#8221; ?</p>
<p>I also wonder how will Google determine if a link was paid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.periscopeup.com/blog/google-polices-paid-links-by-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

